Talk:DIVX: Difference between revisions
Add topicContent deleted Content added
Created page with "Did the DIVX format have worse picture quality than DVD? Is that why the format failed? ~~~~" |
IlCattivo25 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Did the DIVX format have worse picture quality than DVD? Is that why the format failed? |
Did the DIVX format have worse picture quality than DVD? Is that why the format failed? |
||
Also, I've seen some DVD players from around the time DIVX was launched that could play DIVX discs. One model (branded as RCA, distributed by Thomson Consumer Electronics) can be found on a YouTube video uploaded by the user databits. [[Special:Contributions/69.85.235.224|69.85.235.224]] 16:24, 17 August 2023 (UTC) |
|||
* The DIVX format's problems went beyond any bad picture quality that might have plagued it. The DIVX format was afflicted from the start with the cancer that was overzealous copy protection, which kind of metastasized, to put it lightly, over the course of its two years of existence. --[[User:IlCattivo25|IlCattivo25]] ([[User talk:IlCattivo25|talk]]) 19:42, 17 August 2023 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 19:42, 17 August 2023
Did the DIVX format have worse picture quality than DVD? Is that why the format failed?
Also, I've seen some DVD players from around the time DIVX was launched that could play DIVX discs. One model (branded as RCA, distributed by Thomson Consumer Electronics) can be found on a YouTube video uploaded by the user databits. 69.85.235.224 16:24, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
- The DIVX format's problems went beyond any bad picture quality that might have plagued it. The DIVX format was afflicted from the start with the cancer that was overzealous copy protection, which kind of metastasized, to put it lightly, over the course of its two years of existence. --IlCattivo25 (talk) 19:42, 17 August 2023 (UTC)